100 ORGANIZATIONS ARE CALLING ON LLOYD’S TO REJECT EACOP

Lloyd’s of London’s role in mobilizing insurance for the East African Crude Oil Pipeline

Dear Mr. Carnegie-Brown and Mr. Neal,

I am writing on behalf of the #StopEACOP campaign in relation to Lloyd's of London's potential support for the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP), a proposed 1,443-kilometer oil pipeline in Uganda and Tanzania. We believe that Lloyd's members are likely to be approached for (re)insurance coverage for the pipeline.

Campaign members previously reached out to your colleagues Mr. Sansom and Mr. Khilosia in November 2020 and August 2021 to provide a finance risk briefing and updated briefing on the EACOP. Unfortunately, we received no response.  We are now following up with a third update to the risk briefing, dated February of this year. You can find the 2022 update attached. We highly recommend reviewing all three documents in order to gain a full understanding of the range of severe risks and controversies surrounding the EACOP project. 

Here is a high-level overview of the project's key environmental and social risks:

  • If built, the EACOP will be the longest electrically heated pipeline in the world. The pipeline and associated oil extraction projects will impact the land of over 100,000 individuals in Uganda and Tanzania, threatening communities that rely on farming for their livelihoods and for survival. Thousands of project-affected families are already facing food insecurity, having been deprived of the use of their land to produce food and cash crops for several years without any compensation. 

  • The project poses extensive threats to one of the world’s most ecologically diverse regions, and the communities who rely on it: the pipeline would disrupt nearly 2,000 square kilometres of protected wildlife habitats critical to the preservation of vulnerable species like the Eastern Chimpanzee and the African Elephant. It threatens Lake Victoria, a critical freshwater source for more than 40 million people, and Lake Albert, the single largest contributor to Uganda's fishing industry. The upstream component entails drilling 130 oil wells within Uganda's largest and oldest protected nature reserve, Murchison Falls National Park, a Ramsar site which hosts numerous endangered species and is relied upon by over one million people for fishing and water supplies. An oil spill or leak would have catastrophic and irreversible effects on these vital resources. Expert technical reviews of the project have found that the TotalEnergies and CNOOC have failed to employ the 'Best Available Technique' to minimize risks to these critical resources, opting instead for high-risk and low-cost designs.

  • The project poses immense climate risks: the oil transported by EACOP is expected to release an estimated 34.3 million metric tons of CO2 per year, significantly greater than the current annual emissions of Uganda and Tanzania combined.

These risks and impacts are occurring in a high-risk context with an increasingly restricted civic space, in which local communities are not able to safely express their views in relation to the project. Local civil society actors and community leaders have faced intensifying harassment, intimidation, reprisals and arrests for speaking out in defense of their rights – including as recently as this past February – garnering attention from multiple UN Special Rapporteurs.

Many of these human rights, environmental and climate risks are inherent to the project design and purpose, making them impossible to adequately mitigate even if the project sponsors, Total and CNOOC, were to abide by international best practice – which they have failed to do thus far.

As such, the project has faced intense local and transnational resistance, with over one million people having signed a petition against the project. The project faces legal challenges at the nationalregional and international levels, including in French courts and at the East African Court of Justice. This includes a case at the East African court of justice as well as the first case under the duty of vigilance law in the French courts.

At the time of writing, five major multinational (re)insurers, Zurich, AXA, Swiss Re, SCOR and Hannover Re have stated that they will not insure the project. Fifteen major commercial banks from Europe, Japan, Australia and South Africa have publicly stated that they will not participate in the $3 billion project loan needed for the pipeline to reach financial close. The UK export credit agency, UKEF, and the African Development Bank have similarly refused support for the project. This reluctance among potential financiers and insurers has reportedly driven up the project's cost by roughly 30%, from $3.5 billion to $5 billion. It has also fostered significant controversy, creating immense reputational risk for any institution that chooses to support the EACOP.

The #StopEACOP Campaign calls upon Lloyd’s to advise its members against participation in (re)insurance coverage for the East African Crude Oil Pipeline and associated oil projects. We urge Lloyd's members to instead support sustainable and rights-respecting alternative development opportunities in the region. 

We welcome the opportunity to discuss this further in a virtual meeting and look forward to receiving your response by April 18th, 2022. Please direct any responses to Omar Elmawi at info@stopeacop.net and Coleen Scott at coleen@inclusivedevelopment.net

Regards,

Omar Elmawi

Coordinator of #StopEACOP

The organizations that have signed on to this letter include:

  1. #StopEACOP Campaign

  2. 350 Hawaii

  3. 350.org

  4. 350NYC

  5. AbibiNsroma Foundation ANF

  6. Accelerate Neighborhood Climate Action

  7. ActionAid Denmark

  8. Afri-carbon pay organization

  9. Alliance for Empowering Rural Communities

  10. Amis de la Terre France / Friends of the Earth France

  11. AnsvarligFremtid

  12. Avaaz

  13. BankTrack

  14. Barbara asbl

  15. Be The Future

  16. Both ENDS

  17. Businesses for a Livable Climate

  18. Call to Action Colorado

  19. Capitol Heights Presbyterian

  20. CatholicNetwork US

  21. Centre for Citizens Conserving Environment & Management (CECIC)

  22. Citizen's Network For Community Development Zambia

  23. Climate Aid Initiative

  24. CO Businesses for a Livable Climate

  25. Collapse Total Berlin/DE

  26. Community for Sustainable Energy

  27. Community Transformation Foundation Network (COTFONE)

  28. Croydon Climate Action

  29. deCOALonize

  30. Earth Action, Inc.

  31. Earthlife Africa Jhb

  32. Eco Action Families

  33. Empower Venture Partners

  34. Extinction Rebellion San Francisco Bay Area

  35. Famílias pelo Clima

  36. Families for a Livable Climate

  37. FIDEP Foundation

  38. Fridays for Future Uganda

  39. Friends of the Earth US

  40. Greater New Orleans Housing Alliance

  41. GreenFaith

  42. Heinrich Böll Stiftung

  43. I-70 Citizens Advisory Group

  44. Inclusive Development International (IDI)

  45. Indivisible Ambassadors

  46. Innovation pour le Développement et la Protection de l'Environnement

  47. Jamaa Resource Initiatives

  48. Just Share

  49. Justiça Ambiental JA! - FoE Mozambique

  50. Justice, Peace and Integrity of Creation Franciscans Africa

  51. Laudato Si Movement

  52. Leave it in the Ground Initiative (LINGO)

  53. Les Amis de la Terre-Togo

  54. London FOE Network

  55. Mayfair Park Neighborhood Association Board

  56. Mental Health & Inclusion Ministries

  57. Milieudefensie

  58. Montbello Neighborhood Improvement Association

  59. Mothers Out Front Colorado

  60. Mothers Rise Up

  61. Mothers’ Climate Action Network

  62. Mt. Kenya Network Forum

  63. Music Declares Emergency

  64. Natural Justice

  65. North Range Concerned Citizens

  66. Our Kids Climate

  67. Power Shift Africa

  68. Public Citizen

  69. Rainforest Action Network

  70. Rapid Transition Alliance

  71. RapidShift Network

  72. Re-set: platform for social-ecological transformation

  73. Reclaim Finance

  74. ReCommon

  75. Rettet den Regenwald

  76. Sauti ya Wanjiku

  77. Save EPA (former employees)

  78. Sierra Leone School Green Clubs (SLSGC)

  79. Small Business Alliance

  80. South African Faith Communities Environment Institute, SAFCEI

  81. Southwest Organization for Sustainability

  82. Spirit of the Sun, Inc.

  83. Stand.earth

  84. Stop Cambo

  85. SumofUs

  86. System Change Not Climate Change

  87. Talisman

  88. The Green House Connection Center

  89. The Parents' Climate Community

  90. Tipping Point UK

  91. Unite North Metro Denver

  92. Urgewald

  93. Voice of Justice, Kenya

  94. Wall of Women

  95. Warrior Moms

  96. Western Slope Businesses for a Livable Climate

  97. Wilwerding Consulting, Co-Chair, Littleton Business Alliance

  98. Womxn from the Mountain

  99. Working for Racial Equity

  100. Zero Regional Environment Organization

Previous
Previous

The World's Largest reInsurer, Munich Re, Rejects EACOP

Next
Next

Major reinsurer, Hannover Re, becomes 5th re/insurer to opt out of East African Crude Oil Pipeline